Wednesday, May 6, 2015

Journal Q&A

Q: What did you think about yesterday’s digital Peer/Reader Review sesh? Better/worse/same as the “old school” hard copy one? Please explain!
A: Better, because it is very clear to make comments online, but the time is not enough to do two reviews.

Q: Which 2 or 3 comments that you received yesterday were the most helpful for you? Why?
A: 1. Pointing out Thesis state is not good. Thesis is an important part in grading.
2. Some suggestions about grammar mistakes. I often make grammar mistakes or use some inappropriate words.
3. Some suggestions about awkward sentences. It is really hard for myself to find these problems, and readers can easily notice them.

Q: So, in the end, how’d your WP2 paper go? What were you happy with? What weren’t you? Why? Be specific! (Remember: this is fodder for your end-of-quarter metacognitive reflection)
A: I think my WP has been improved, and the suggestions from peer review is very helpful. However, I have trouble connecting PB with class reading because I cannot find related content in the book.

No comments:

Post a Comment