Sunday, May 10, 2015

PB3A

Ting Pan
Writing 2 / MW 3PM
05/10/2015
PB3A

    In recent years, climate change has became one of the most important environmental issues. We can see the news and reports about it everywhere and there are many different theories and research about this environmental crisis. The scholarly publication that I choose to work with is “The Real Case against Activist Global Warming Policy,” which is an academic journal. The author expresses his thoughts against activist global warming policy. Topics mentioned include the overview of the beliefs of global warming activists, the extensive chain of assumptions used to justify carbon-dioxide-limiting policies among climate alarmists, and the government efficacy proposition, and views among skeptics of the global warming theory on other anthropocentric warming agents apart from carbon dioxide.
    For a younger audience, this scholarly text can be transformed to an encyclopedia article. First, this is a type of reference work, so the title should be clear and direct, which is convenient for the audience to access by it. For this article, the name can be “Activist Global Warming Policy” or “Global Warming Activist”. Secondly, encyclopedia entries are detailed but not wordy. In the academic piece, we can find that the author explains every point repeatedly and uses many examples to illustrate his points of view. However, for encyclopedia articles, each point must be stated concisely, and the use of examples is restricted strictly - they should be familiar to everyone or from credible sources. For example, the author of the scholarly article states that “It may be, for example, that the cost of sending the fire crew - including possible loss of life - exceeds the value of the timber that might be saved from fire,” but such uncertain example is not qualified for encyclopedia. Thirdly, there are lots of personal opinions in this academic piece, but some of them are not allowed to appear in encyclopedia articles. For instance, the author writes that “Once we overcome the static fallacy, we see that this image is quite ridiculous,” such opinions is subjective and not suitable for encyclopedia articles. Last but not least, in encyclopedia articles, the words are simple and there must be explanation for topic-specific terms. Because of different target audience, scholarly articles are complex and contains words which are not commonly used. It is significant to add explanations of some terms or change them to simple ones.
    To reach an older audience, I think translating this piece to a newspaper article is an good choice. Newspaper article are much shorter than these academic pieces, so I need to use word economy. For example, the sentence “As the global warming debate is carried on today, almost all the attention goes to the first three propositions” can be transform to “Nowadays, almost attention to this debate goes to the first three propositions.” Then, I have to think about the structure of the article. At the beginning of the article, I need to use one or two sentences to briefly summarize the article, which answers the basic questions of "who, what, when, where, how and why." In addition, a key point is of vital importance in newspaper articles. We notice that the author of the academic article writes every point detailedly, but when changing to a newspaper article, I have to write the most important information firstly, and then mention the less important ones later in the article, which is as the inverted pyramid format. Lastly, write a conclusion to re-summarize the most important information of the article. In this academic text, there is no conclusion. However, adding it to my newspaper article is crucial. 
    This is how I plan to translate the scholarly piece to the other two genres of works.

3 comments:

  1. I think that an encyclopedia is a good genre to choose to transform the academic journal for a younger audience. It’s important to be able to read encyclopedia entries as well. It seems like you know how to transform the genre quite well so that the information accurately fits. I think the newspaper genre is a good choice for an older generation. Newspapers are a good way to get information across to a wide audience, and climate change is important for people to be informed about. The two genres you chose to transform the academic journal into are good! I think they both work well and are still very informative.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I really enjoy the topic you chose and how relevant it is to today and for the future.
    The topic you choose is really broad which allows you to really have the freedom to pick and choose what you are talking about. I think for a younger audience to understand you, you really just have to talk about the most important facts and not be to fluffy with detail, which you explained. I also think the older audiences genre being a newspaper is a good idea because that is a major source that adults read and keep up with. Just make sure to keep a formal tone in writing it to make sure it sounds like a newspaper article.

    ReplyDelete
  3. First of all, it should be "have become" at the beginning sentence : ) The climate change is actually a very serious topic. I think encyclopedia, which is concise and unbiased, is a good method to show the young people what is climate change. However, I think the elderly use encyclopedia very often as well. There may be other methods that are better to focus on the young people, like comics, etc. Newspaper, which is shorter and is a very good way to focus on the elderly. In the last paragraph, you said you should add an introduction at the beginning of the newspaper to answer some basic questions. I think it should be more specific to show what questions are basic. Lastly, you said you should state the less important things later in the newspaper. However, you also claimed that we should use word economy. So, it would be better to just delete the less important ones: )

    ReplyDelete